• CSCD中国科学引文数据库来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊
  • 中国机械工程学会材料分会会刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
高级检索

桥梁钢裂纹尖端张开位移与试样厚度关系式的改进

陈春君, 苗张木

陈春君, 苗张木. 桥梁钢裂纹尖端张开位移与试样厚度关系式的改进[J]. 机械工程材料, 2018, 42(12): 9-12,46. DOI: 10.11973/jxgccl201812002
引用本文: 陈春君, 苗张木. 桥梁钢裂纹尖端张开位移与试样厚度关系式的改进[J]. 机械工程材料, 2018, 42(12): 9-12,46. DOI: 10.11973/jxgccl201812002
CHEN Chunjun, MIAO Zhangmu. Improvement of Relational Expression between Crack Tip Opening Displacement and Specimen Thickness of Bridge Steel[J]. Materials and Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 42(12): 9-12,46. DOI: 10.11973/jxgccl201812002
Citation: CHEN Chunjun, MIAO Zhangmu. Improvement of Relational Expression between Crack Tip Opening Displacement and Specimen Thickness of Bridge Steel[J]. Materials and Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 42(12): 9-12,46. DOI: 10.11973/jxgccl201812002

桥梁钢裂纹尖端张开位移与试样厚度关系式的改进

基金项目: 

中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(175202002)

详细信息
    作者简介:

    陈春君(1993-),男,重庆人,硕士研究生

  • 中图分类号: TG407

Improvement of Relational Expression between Crack Tip Opening Displacement and Specimen Thickness of Bridge Steel

  • 摘要: 分析了闫鹏帅等建立的裂纹尖端张开位移(CTOD)与厚度关系式(厚度效应关系式)在应用于桥梁钢时产生较大误差的原因,应用构造法对该关系式进行了改进;使用不同厚度桥梁钢试样(14MnNbq钢、14MnNbq钢接头焊缝、16Mnq钢)的CTOD试验值对改进后的厚度效应关系式进行了验证。结果表明:导致原厚度效应关系式误差较大的原因是平面应力部分的函数形式不合理,以概率密度函数替换该函数后,拟合得到的不同厚度桥梁钢试样的CTOD值与试验值的相对误差较小,改进后的厚度效应关系式适用于不同的桥梁钢。
    Abstract: The reason why the relational expression beteen crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) and thickness (thickness effect expression), which was established by YAN Pengshuai et al., has relatively large errors in the application of bridge steels was analyzed, and then the expression was improved by construction method. The improved thickness effect expression was verified with test values of CTOD of bridge steel specimens (14MnNbq steel, weld of 14MnNbq steel joint, 16Mnq steel) with different thicknesses. The results show that the reason for relatively large errors by the original thickness effect expression was that the function form of the plane stress part was unreasonable. The expression was improved by replacing the unreasonable function with a probability density function. The relative errors between the fitted values by the improved expression and the test values of CTOD of the bridge steel samples with different thicknesses were relatively small. Therefore, the improved thickness effect expression is suitable for different bridge steels.
  • [1] 苗张木. 厚钢板焊接接头韧度CTOD评定研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学,2005:7-12.
    [2] 张红胜. 钢结构桥梁CTOD断裂韧性研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学,2010:47-52.
    [3]

    PALOMBO M, SANDON S, DE MARCO M. An evaluation of size effect in CTOD-SENB fracture toughness tests[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 109:55-64.

    [4]

    PUTATUNDA S K. Fracture toughness of a high carbon and high silicon steel[J]. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2001, 297(1/2):31-43.

    [5]

    HAN K J, SHUAI J, DENG X M, et al. The effect of constraint on CTOD fracture toughness of API X65 steel[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2014, 124:167-181.

    [6] 闫鹏帅, 苗张木, 夏子钰, 等. 试样厚度与CTOD临界值的拟合关系式[J]. 机械工程材料, 2013, 37(8):95-97.
    [7] 肖纪美. 金属的韧性与韧化[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社,1980:77-79.
    [8] 杨继运, 张行. 材料断裂韧度与试样厚度关系研究[J]. 机械强度, 2003, 25(1):76-80.
    [9]

    WELLS A A. Application of fracture mechanics at and beyond general yielding[J]. British Welding Journal, 1963, 10(5):563-570.

    [10] 张玉玲. 大型铁路焊接钢桥疲劳断裂性能与安全设计[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2004:82-107.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-09-06
  • 修回日期:  2018-09-11
  • 刊出日期:  2018-12-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回