• CSCD中国科学引文数据库来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊
  • 中国机械工程学会材料分会会刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
高级检索

不同工艺制备52M合金堆焊层的高温低塑性裂纹敏感性

曾春杰, 李东, 方虎

曾春杰, 李东, 方虎. 不同工艺制备52M合金堆焊层的高温低塑性裂纹敏感性[J]. 机械工程材料, 2019, 43(5): 30-33,61. DOI: 10.11973/jxgccl201905006
引用本文: 曾春杰, 李东, 方虎. 不同工艺制备52M合金堆焊层的高温低塑性裂纹敏感性[J]. 机械工程材料, 2019, 43(5): 30-33,61. DOI: 10.11973/jxgccl201905006
ZENG Chunjie, LI Dong, FANG Hu. High-temperature Ductility-dip Cracking Susceptibility of 52M Alloy Surfacing Layer Prepared by Different Processes[J]. Materials and Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 43(5): 30-33,61. DOI: 10.11973/jxgccl201905006
Citation: ZENG Chunjie, LI Dong, FANG Hu. High-temperature Ductility-dip Cracking Susceptibility of 52M Alloy Surfacing Layer Prepared by Different Processes[J]. Materials and Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 43(5): 30-33,61. DOI: 10.11973/jxgccl201905006

不同工艺制备52M合金堆焊层的高温低塑性裂纹敏感性

详细信息
    作者简介:

    曾春杰(1993-),男,安徽淮北人,硕士研究生

  • 中图分类号: TG455

High-temperature Ductility-dip Cracking Susceptibility of 52M Alloy Surfacing Layer Prepared by Different Processes

  • 摘要: 以52M合金焊丝为堆焊材料,分别采用激光堆焊和TIG堆焊在S304不锈钢基体上制备了52M合金堆焊层,研究了堆焊层的显微组织、物相组成和高温低塑性裂纹敏感性。结果表明:两种堆焊层的显微组织均为单相奥氏体;与TIG堆焊层相比,激光堆焊层的晶粒较小且形态规则;两种堆焊层中均有Cr23C6析出,激光堆焊层的析出物数量较少;在相同温度、不同应变下激光堆焊层中的裂纹数量均少于TIG堆焊层中的;随着应变的增加,激光堆焊层中的裂纹数量增加较快,但其高温低塑性裂纹敏感性较低。
    Abstract: 52M alloy surfacing layer was deposited on the substrate of S304 stainless steel by laser surfacing and TIG surfacing, respectively, with 52M alloy wire as surfacing material, and then the microstructure, phase composition and sensitivity of high-temperature ductility-dip cracking of the surfacing layers were studied. The results show that the microstructures of the two surfacing layers consisted of uniphase austenite. Compared with those of the TIG surfacing layer, the grain size of the laser surfacing layer was smaller and the grain shape was more regular. Cr23C6 was precipitated in the two surfacing layers. The amount of the precipitates in the laser surfacing layer was relatively small. The amount of cracks in the laser surfacing layer was smaller than that in the TIG surfacing layer at the same temperature and different strains. With the increase of strain, the amount of cracks in the laser surfacing layer increased faster, but the sensitivity of ductility-dip cracking was lower.
  • [1] 李玉龙, 禹业晓. TIG堆焊技术研究进展[J]. 电焊机, 2012, 42(12):70-76.
    [2] 吴世凯, 肖荣诗, 陈铠. 大厚度不锈钢板的激光焊接[J]. 中国激光, 2009, 36(9):2422-2425.
    [3] 彭进, 李俐群, 林尚扬, 等. 激光液态填充焊的填材熔化与过渡稳定性[J]. 焊接学报, 2016, 37(7):9-12.
    [4] 崔巍, 陈静青, 陆皓, 等. 晶界滑移对镍基合金失延开裂的影响[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2013, 23(5):1269-1274.
    [5]

    KADOI K, UEGAKI T, SHINOZAKI K, et al. New measurement technique of ductility curve for ductility-dip cracking susceptibility in Alloy 690 welds[J]. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2016, 672:59-64.

    [6]

    RAMIREZ A J, SOWARDS J W, LIPPOLD J C. Improving the ductility-dip cracking resistance of Ni-base alloys[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2006, 179(1/2/3):212-218.

    [7]

    NISSLEY N E, LIPPOLD J C. Development of the strain-to-fracture test[J]. Welding Journal, 2003, 82(12):355-364.

    [8]

    WEI X, XU M J, WANG Q Z, et al. Effect of local texture and precipitation on the ductility dip cracking of ERNiCrFe-7A Ni-based overlay[J]. Materials & Design, 2016, 110:90-98.

    [9] 陈静青, 陆皓, 陈辉, 等. 晶粒尺度对镍基高温合金的高温失塑裂纹敏感性的影响[J]. 电焊机, 2015, 45(6):21-25.
    [10]

    HUA C, LU H, YU C, et al. Reduction of ductility-dip cracking susceptibility by ultrasonic-assisted GTAW[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2017,239:240-250.

    [11]

    RAMIREZ A J, LIPPOLD J C. High temperature behavior of Ni-base weld metal[J]. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2004, 380(1/2):259-271.

    [12]

    YOUNG G A. The mechanism of ductility dip cracking in nickel-chromium alloys[J]. Welding Journal, 2008, 2(S2):31-43.

    [13]

    LEE T H, SUH H Y, HAN S K, et al. Effect of a heat treatment on the precipitation behavior and tensile properties of Alloy 690 steam generator tubes[J]. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2016, 479:85-92.

计量
  • 文章访问数:  2
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-05-20
  • 修回日期:  2019-04-01
  • 刊出日期:  2019-05-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回