高级检索
    金丹, 郭超越, 孙梦莹, 刘壮, 李卓群. 316L不锈钢非比例循环硬化特性的数值模拟[J]. 机械工程材料, 2024, 48(1): 112-118. DOI: 10.11973/jxgccl202401018
    引用本文: 金丹, 郭超越, 孙梦莹, 刘壮, 李卓群. 316L不锈钢非比例循环硬化特性的数值模拟[J]. 机械工程材料, 2024, 48(1): 112-118. DOI: 10.11973/jxgccl202401018
    JIN Dan, GUO Chaoyue, SUN Mengying, LIU Zhuang, LI Zhuoqun. Numerical Simulation of Non-proportional Cyclic Hardening Characteristics of 316L Stainless Steel[J]. Materials and Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 48(1): 112-118. DOI: 10.11973/jxgccl202401018
    Citation: JIN Dan, GUO Chaoyue, SUN Mengying, LIU Zhuang, LI Zhuoqun. Numerical Simulation of Non-proportional Cyclic Hardening Characteristics of 316L Stainless Steel[J]. Materials and Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 48(1): 112-118. DOI: 10.11973/jxgccl202401018

    316L不锈钢非比例循环硬化特性的数值模拟

    Numerical Simulation of Non-proportional Cyclic Hardening Characteristics of 316L Stainless Steel

    • 摘要: 在等效应变范围为0.7%条件下,对316L不锈钢进行室温应变控制拉-扭疲劳试验,研究了比例应变路径(单轴路径和比例路径)和非比例应变路径(十字路径和圆路径)下的循环硬化特性;采用AF-OW随动硬化模型结合Chaboche各向同性硬化准则以及将非比例度嵌入到各向同性硬化准则中的改进模型对各路径下的循环特性进行模拟,并进行试验验证。结果表明:316L不锈钢在各路径下的循环初期均产生了循环硬化现象,在单轴、比例、十字和圆路径下的硬化率分别为5.2%,4.5%,38.2%,44.6%,在非比例应变路径下,该钢产生明显的附加强化;AF-OW模型结合各向同性硬化准则可以准确地模拟单轴和比例路径下的循环硬化特性,但对十字和圆路径下的模拟效果较差,模拟得到的正应力-正应变滞回环与试验结果之间的最大相对误差均大于20%;改进模型可以准确地描述十字和圆路径下的循环硬化特性,正应力-正应变滞回环的最大相对误差分别为1.3%和3.2%,最大等效峰值应力的相对误差分别为1.9%和1.2%。

       

      Abstract: The strain-controlled tensile and torsional fatigue tests at room temperature were carried out on 316L stainless steel under the equivalent strain range of 0.7%, and the cyclic hardening characteristics of proportional strain path (uniaxial path and proportional path) and non-proportional strain path (cruciform path and circular path) were discussed. The cyclic characteristics under each path were simulated by AF-OW dynamic hardening model combined with Chaboche isotropic hardening criteria and an improved model by embedding non-proportionality into the isotropic hardening criteria, and the experimental verification was carried out. The results show that 316L stainless steel showed cyclic hardening phenomenon in the early cycle under each path. The cyclic hardening rates were 5.2%, 4.5%, 38.2% and 44.6% under uniaxial path, proportional path, cruciform path and circular path, respectively. Under the non-proportional strain path, the steel showed obvious additional strengthening. The AF-OW model combined with the isotropic hardening criterion could accurately simulate the cyclic hardening characteristics under uniaxial and proportional paths; the simulation did not agree well with the test results under cruciform path and circular path, and the maximum relative errors between the simulated normal stress-normal strain hysteresis loop and test results were both larger than 20%. The modified model could accurately describe the cyclic hardening characteristics under the cruciform path and circular path. The maximum relative errors of the normal stress-normal strain hysteresis loop were 1.3% and 3.2%, and the relative errors of the maximum equivalent peak stress were 1.9% and 1.2% under the cruciform and circular paths, respectively.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回