高级检索

    服役后CL60合金钢和非合金钢车轮磨损面显微组织演变及多边形磨耗行为的对比

    Comparison of Wear Surface Microstructure Evolution and Polygonal Wear Behavior of CL60 Alloy Steel and Non Alloy Steel Wheel after Service

    • 摘要: 对同一地铁车辆镟修后服役2×104 km的CL60合金钢和非合金钢车轮进行组织观察、拉伸试验、硬度测试和摩擦磨损试验,对比了两种车轮材料显微组织和力学性能演变,分析了车轮多边形磨耗行为。结果表明:两种车轮钢均属于铁素体-珠光体钢,由珠光体和少量先共析铁素体组成,合金钢的珠光体片层距小于非合金钢,两种钢中先共析铁素体含量相近,合金钢的硬度、屈服强度、抗拉强度更大;服役后合金钢车轮踏面平均晶粒尺寸更大、应变硬化程度更小、残余压应力更小;合金钢车轮抗多边形磨耗能力优于非合金钢车轮。

       

      Abstract: The microstructure observation, tensile test, hardness test and friction wear test were carried on the CL60 alloy and non-alloy wheels of the same subway vehicle that had been overhauled and put into service for 20 000 kilometers. The microstructure and mechanical properties evolution of the two types of wheel material were compared. The polygonal wear behavior was analyzed. The results show that two types of wheel steel belonged to ferrite-austenite steel, composed of austenite and a small amount of pre-equilibrium ferrite. The layer spacing of austenite in alloy steel was smaller than that in non-alloy steel, the content of pre-equilibrium ferrite in two types of steel was similar, the hardness, yield strength and tensile strength of the alloy steel were greater.The average grain size of the tread of alloy steel wheel after service was larger, the strain hardening degree was smaller, and the residual compressive stress was smaller. The polygonal wear resistance of the alloy steel wheel was better than this of the non alloy steel wheel.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回