高级检索

    ZL702A铝合金等温压缩本构模型的建立及预测精度对比

    Establishment and Prediction Accuracy Comparison of Isothermal Compression Constitutive Model of ZL702A Aluminum Alloy

    • 摘要: 利用Gleeble-3800型热模拟试验机对ZL702A铝合金进行不同温度(200,350,460,500 ℃)和不同应变速率(0.1,0.01,0.001 s−1)下的等温压缩试验,根据真应力-真应变曲线,考虑应变对模型参数的影响,构建了修正的Johnson-Cook(m-JC)本构模型、修正的Zerilli-Armstrong(m-ZA)本构模型、Arrhenius本构模型,并对高温流变行为进行预测,评价了模型的预测精度。结果表明:Arrhenius模型不同应变下流变应力预测值与试验值的绝对相对误差相差较大,表现出显著的应变敏感性,在0.10~0.25应变范围内的预测精度较低;m-JC模型和m-ZA模型在不同应变下流变应力预测值与试验值的绝对相对误差相差较小,预测精度受应变影响较小。m-ZA模型预测流变应力的平均绝对相对误差显著低于m-ZA模型和Arrhenius模型,相关系数最大(0.997),表现出较优秀的预测效果。

       

      Abstract: Isothermal compression tests were conducted on ZL702A aluminum alloy under different temperatures (200, 350, 460, 500 ℃) and strain rates (0.1, 0.01, 0.001 s−1) by using the Gleeble-3800 thermal simulator. According to the true stress-true strain curves, considering the influence of strain on the model parameters, the modified Johnson-Cook (m-JC) constitutive model, the modified Zerilli-Armstrong (m-ZA) constitutive model, and the Arrhenius constitutive model were constructed, and were used to predict the high temperature rheological behavior. The prediction accuracy of the models was evaluated. The results show that the absolute relative error between the prediction of flow stresses by the Arrhenius model and the test values varied significantly under different strains, demonstrating a notable strain sensitivity, and the prediction accuracy within the 0.10−0.25 strain range was relatively low. The absolute relative errors of the prediction by the m-JC model and the m-ZA model under different strains varied slightly, and the prediction accuracy was less affected by strain. The average absolute relative error of the m-ZA model was significantly lower than that of m-JC and Arrhenius models, with the highest correlation coefficient (0.997), indicating a more excellent prediction effect.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回