高级检索
    万玉敏, 张发, 竺铝涛. 泡沫夹层复合材料与复合材料层合板低速冲击性能的比较[J]. 机械工程材料, 2014, 38(7): 90-94.
    引用本文: 万玉敏, 张发, 竺铝涛. 泡沫夹层复合材料与复合材料层合板低速冲击性能的比较[J]. 机械工程材料, 2014, 38(7): 90-94.
    WAN Yu-min, ZHANG Fa, ZHU Lü-tao. Comparison of Low-Velocity Impact Properties between Foam Sandwich Composites and Composite Laminates[J]. Materials and Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 38(7): 90-94.
    Citation: WAN Yu-min, ZHANG Fa, ZHU Lü-tao. Comparison of Low-Velocity Impact Properties between Foam Sandwich Composites and Composite Laminates[J]. Materials and Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 38(7): 90-94.

    泡沫夹层复合材料与复合材料层合板低速冲击性能的比较

    Comparison of Low-Velocity Impact Properties between Foam Sandwich Composites and Composite Laminates

    • 摘要: 采用[0°]8, [0°,90°]2s方式铺成的碳纤维增强环氧树脂预浸料作为泡沫夹层复合材料的面板, PMI(聚甲基丙烯酰亚胺)泡沫作为芯材, 制得泡沫夹层复合材料(12 mm厚); 采用相同预浸料和[0°]16, [0°,90°]4s的铺层方式制备了复合材料层合板(2 mm厚), 对比研究了两种复合材料的低速冲击性能。结果表明: 无论是泡沫夹层复合材料还是复合材料层合板, 正交铺层结构比单向铺层结构的冲击载荷峰值高, 冲击损伤程度小, 抗冲击能力好; 在两种铺层方式下, 泡沫夹层复合材料的抗冲击能力明显优于复合材料层合板的。

       

      Abstract: Foam sandwich composites (thickness of 12 mm), with composite faces from carbon/epoxy unidirectional performs and cores from Rohacell(PMI), were fabricated. The face sheets of the foam sandwich composites were laminated as [0°]8,[0°, 90°]2s structures. The composite laminates (thickness of 2 mm) composed of the same material with the face sheets of foam sandwich composites were prepared, whose structures were [0°]16 and [0°, 90°]4s . The low velocity impact properties of the two composites were studied. The results show that, for both the composites, the face sheet with cross structure could stand higher impact loads and with better impact resistance than the face sheet with unidirectional structure. Additionally, the impact resistance of the foam sandwich composites were obviously superior to that of the composite laminates at the two lamination methods.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回