高级检索
    张凌枫, 刘仁培, 汪虎, 吴健. 两种模具堆焊修复用药芯焊丝堆焊金属的性能对比[J]. 机械工程材料, 2011, 35(2): 27-29.
    引用本文: 张凌枫, 刘仁培, 汪虎, 吴健. 两种模具堆焊修复用药芯焊丝堆焊金属的性能对比[J]. 机械工程材料, 2011, 35(2): 27-29.
    ZHANG Ling-feng, LIU Ren-pei, WANG Hu, WU Jian. Performance Comparison of Surfacing Metals with Two Flux-Cored Wires for Die Surfacing Repair[J]. Materials and Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 35(2): 27-29.
    Citation: ZHANG Ling-feng, LIU Ren-pei, WANG Hu, WU Jian. Performance Comparison of Surfacing Metals with Two Flux-Cored Wires for Die Surfacing Repair[J]. Materials and Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 35(2): 27-29.

    两种模具堆焊修复用药芯焊丝堆焊金属的性能对比

    Performance Comparison of Surfacing Metals with Two Flux-Cored Wires for Die Surfacing Repair

    • 摘要: 对两种商用模具堆焊修复用药芯焊丝堆焊金属进行了硬度及冲击韧性对比试验, 分析了性能产生差异的原因。结果表明: 525焊丝堆焊金属的硬度及冲击韧性均高于136焊丝堆焊金属的; 两种焊丝堆焊金属基体组织均由马氏体、贝氏体和铁素体组成, 但525焊丝堆焊金属的晶粒尺寸较小, 堆焊金属冲击断口的纤维区面积较大, 韧窝更小、更多; 两者韧性存在差异的原因是136焊丝堆焊金属组织中含有尺寸较大的脆性夹杂物和晶粒。

       

      Abstract: The contrast tests of hardness and impact toughness were performed with surfacing metals with two commercial flux-cored wires for die surfacing repair. The cause of performance difference was analyzed. The results show that the hardness and impact toughness of the surfacing metal with 525 welding wire were higher than those of the metal with 136 welding wire. The substrate microstructure of both the two surfacing metals was composed of martensite, bainite and ferrite. The grain size of surfacing metal with 525 welding wire was smaller. The area of fibre zone on impact fracture of the surfacing metal was large while more and smaller dimples were found in the metal with 525 wire. The reason for toughness difference of the two metals was brittle inclusion with large size existing in the microstructure of the surfacing metal with 136 melding wire.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回