高级检索
    杨东平, 胥聪敏, 盛燕, 罗金恒, 王珂. 0.8设计系数用X80管线钢焊接接头的失效评估曲线[J]. 机械工程材料, 2014, 38(9): 47-50.
    引用本文: 杨东平, 胥聪敏, 盛燕, 罗金恒, 王珂. 0.8设计系数用X80管线钢焊接接头的失效评估曲线[J]. 机械工程材料, 2014, 38(9): 47-50.
    YANG Dong-ping, XU Cong-min, SHENG Yan, LUO Jin-heng, WANG Ke. Failure Assessment Curves of Welded Joint of X80 Pipeline Steel with Design Factor of 0.8[J]. Materials and Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 38(9): 47-50.
    Citation: YANG Dong-ping, XU Cong-min, SHENG Yan, LUO Jin-heng, WANG Ke. Failure Assessment Curves of Welded Joint of X80 Pipeline Steel with Design Factor of 0.8[J]. Materials and Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 38(9): 47-50.

    0.8设计系数用X80管线钢焊接接头的失效评估曲线

    Failure Assessment Curves of Welded Joint of X80 Pipeline Steel with Design Factor of 0.8

    • 摘要: 根据GB 2038-1991, 对0.8设计系数用X80管线钢焊接接头母材及焊缝进行了三点弯曲试验, 据此进行断裂韧性及失效评估曲线(建立R6-3失效评估曲线, 并与R6-1曲线和R6-2曲线进行了比较)的研究。结果表明: 根据J-R阻力曲线测得X80管线钢母材和焊缝的断裂韧度分别为1 080, 298 kJ·m-2; 在高载荷下, 母材的R6-3失效评估曲线比焊缝的略高, 这是由于母材具有较高的塑性; R6-3曲线的安全范围最大, 能够精确反映材料性能、加载类型及构件形状, 精度高于R6-1和R6-2曲线的, 能够更好地发挥材料的性能。

       

      Abstract: Three point bending test was carried on the base metal and weld seam of X80 pipeline steel with design factor of 0.8, and then according to GB 2038-1991 standard to conduct the study of fracture toughness and failure assessment curves(the R6-3 failure assessment curve had constructed, as compared to R6-1 and R6-2 curves).The results show that the fracture toughness of X80 pipeline steel base metal and weld seam were 1 080 kJ·m-2 and 298 kJ·m-2 based on J-R resistance curves. The failure assessment curves of the base metal was more high than that of the weld seam when the load was high because of the base metal owing more high plasticity. Meanwhile, the R6-3 curve had the biggest safety range and the highest precision,these could accurately reflect the performance of the material, load type and shape of the components, also preferably played the performance of the material.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回