• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD中国科学引文数据库来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国机械工程学会材料分会会刊
Advanced Search
TANG Jia-rui, CHEN Hong-yuan, GAO Hui-lin, JI Ling-kang. Fracture Toughness of X70 Steel Pipeline Girth Weld under Low Constraint Condition Joint[J]. Materials and Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 40(3): 27-30. DOI: 10.11973/jxgccl201603007
Citation: TANG Jia-rui, CHEN Hong-yuan, GAO Hui-lin, JI Ling-kang. Fracture Toughness of X70 Steel Pipeline Girth Weld under Low Constraint Condition Joint[J]. Materials and Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 40(3): 27-30. DOI: 10.11973/jxgccl201603007

Fracture Toughness of X70 Steel Pipeline Girth Weld under Low Constraint Condition Joint

More Information
  • Received Date: September 26, 2015
  • The single-edge-notched-tensile (SENT) test was carried out on strain-based design of X70 steel pipeline to measure crack tip opening displacement of girth weld metal and heat affected zone. The fracture resistance curves during crack ductile extension process were obtained and tested results of heat affected zone sample were validated. The results show that the distance from crack tip of heat affected zone sample to fusion line was within 0.5 mm. Fracture resistance curves of weld metal and heat affected zone samples as followed: δ=1.395 78(Δa)0.783 35, δ=1.553 38(Δa)0.821 75. Fracture toughness of pipeline girth weld under low constraint condition can be accurately measured by SENT test. The tested results can provide evidence for strain-based design pipeline and engineering critical assessment.
  • [1]
    罗金恒,赵新伟,李新华. X80管线钢断裂韧性研究[J].压力容器,2007,24(8):6-9.
    [2]
    杨东平,胥聪敏,盛燕.0.8设计系数用X80管线钢焊接接头的失效评估曲线[J].机械工程材料,2014,38(9):47-50.
    [3]
    李继红,杨亮,张敏.X100管线钢焊接接头的显微组织和性能[J].机械工程材料,2014,38(2):59-62.
    [4]
    马朝晖. 基于应变设计X70管线钢管高强匹配环缝焊接性评估[J].宝钢技术,2014(3):1-4.
    [5]
    刘硕. 管线钢管环焊接头CTOD断裂韧性评估技术[J].宝钢技术,2014(3):46-53.
    [6]
    姚登樽,隋永莉,孙哲. X70管线钢管环焊缝宽板拉伸试验[J].焊管,2014,37(6):26-30.
    [7]
    CHENG W, TANG H, GIOIELLI P C, et al. Test methods for characterization of strain capacity: comparision of R-curves from SENT/CWP/FS tests[C]// Pipe Technology conference.[S.l.]:[s.n], 2009:12-14.
    [8]
    FAIRCHILD D P, SHAFROVA S Y, TANG H, et al. Observations on the design, execution, and use of full-scale testing for strain-based design pipelines[C]// Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth (2014) International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference. [S.l.]:[s.n], 2014:556-565.
    [9]
    KALYANAM S, WILKOWSKI G M, SHIM D J. Why conduct sen(t) tests and considerations in conducting/analyzing sen(t) testing[C]// Proceedings of the 8th International Pipeline Conference.[S.l.]:[s.n],2010: 337-346.
    [10]
    徐杰. 管线钢裂尖约束对韧脆断裂行为的影响[D].北京: 北京科技大学,2009.
    [11]
    SHEN G, TYSON W R. Crack size evaluation using unloading compliance in single-specimen single-edge notched tension fracture toughness testing[J]. Testing and Evaluation,2014,37(4):1-11.
    [12]
    VERSTRAETE M A, HERTEL S, DENYS R M, et al. Evaluation and interpretation of ductile crack extension in SENT specimens using unloading compliance technique[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2014, 115: 190-203.
    [13]
    TANG H, MACIA M, MINNAAR K. Development of the SENT test for strain-based design of welded pipelines[C]// Proceedings of the 8th International Pipeline Conference[S.l.]:[s.n], 2010: 303-312.
    [14]
    KIBEY S, WANG X, MINNAAR K, et al. Tensile strain capacity equations for strain-based design of welded pipelines[C]//2010 8th International Pipeline Conference. [S.l.]:American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2010: 355-363.

Catalog

    Article views (5) PDF downloads (1) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return